Web1. The intended victim must be reasonably identifiable. 2. The peril must be foreseeable. Mavroudis v. Superior Court of San Mateo Imminence is necessary for Tarasoff duty to exist Hedlund v. Superior Court of Orange County Therapist has liability to foreseeable bystanders if s/he does not fullfill Tarasoff responsibility. Menendez v. Web(Compare Daily Journal Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 20 Cal.4th at pp. 1127-1128 [only under three narrow exceptions will grand jury proceedings be made public] with Swanner …
The Superior Court of California - Name Search FAQ - occourts.org
WebJan 1, 2024 · Grassi v. Superior Court of Orange County (Cal. Ct. App., Dec. 28, 2024, No. G060362) 2024 WL 6124764, at *1. Summary: Grassi filed a petition for writ of … WebDec 29, 2024 · In February 2024, Grassi filed a motion for misdemeanor diversion under the new misdemeanor diversion law. Her request was denied after Orange County … the pahrump nugget hotel and casino
Hartman v. The Superior Court of Orange County - unicourt.com
WebThe court may deny access to a member of the public for failure to comply with any of these conditions of use. Any person who willfully destroys or alters any court record maintained in electronic form is subject to the penalties imposed by Government Code section 6201. WebMar 17, 2024 · In February 2024, Grassi filed a motion for misdemeanor diversion under the new misdemeanor diversion law. Her request was denied after Orange County … Web(Compare Daily Journal Corp. v. Superior Court, supra, 20 Cal.4th at pp. 1127-1128 [only under three narrow exceptions will grand jury proceedings be made public] with Swanner v. United States (5th Cir. 1969) 406 F.2d 716, 719 ["while pendency of a criminal investigation is a reason for denying discovery of investigative reports, this privilege ... shuts in chinese translation